Debating the Rouge…in 1912

Quintessentially Canadian. Quirky. A reward for failure. Embarrassing. All of these have been used to describe a scoring play unique to Canadian football: the rouge.

The rouge (or a single) is a one-point score awarded to the team who kicks the ball into their opponent’s end zone and when the ball is not returned or kicked back out of the end zone by the opposing team. This can be as a result of a kickoff, punt, or missed field goal.

If the opposing team doesn’t get the ball out of their end zone or if the ball passes the dead ball line at the back of the end zone, a single point is scored for the kicking team.

From time to time a debate ensues over whether to keep or get rid of the rouge. Most CFL and Canadian football fans argue it’s an integral part of the Canadian game both strategically and culturally. But, others say its inclusion rewards failure (because a point is often scored on a missed field goal) or, worse, makes the CFL look unprofessional or gimmicky.

Regardless, the debate over the rouge is nothing new. Below is an article that appeared in the Toronto Star in 1912 about abolishing the rouge in Canadian football. Remember, back then Canadian football was often referred to as rugby.

The main argument in this article seems to be that getting rid of the rouge would encourage more touchdowns and drop kicks – and that teams would no longer be able to take advantage of strong winds to score single points.

Source: The Toronto Star, 19 November 1912, page 13. (newspapers.com)

Comments

4 responses to “Debating the Rouge…in 1912”

  1. Mike Funston Avatar
    Mike Funston

    I enjoyed reading this old debate about the rouge in the context of the present debate.
    I love the rouge and don’t want it changed. It’s part of Canadian football tradition. By the way, I remember playing in a high school game in 1969 which my team, Neil McNeil (Toronto) lost to St. Michael’s 2-1 on rouges. We tried a long field goal on the last play of the game for the win but it landed short and didn’t roll into the end zone, so no rouge. No tie.

  2. J5V Avatar
    J5V

    100 years ago there were a handful of different leagues in Canada playing by different rules. In the west, if the ball did not land in the endzone (ie. it was kicked through the endzone without landing in the field of play) you did not get a point. To get the point the ball had to be playable.

    1. Robert Finch Avatar

      This is a compromise I could live with when it comes to the rouge. I see some merit in only giving the point if the ball is playable.

  3. Don Charabin Avatar
    Don Charabin

    The rouge was never a reward for failure.

    If a team punted, drop kicked, or place kicked the ball into the endzone (without the ball returned out of the endzone) or through the endzone that kicking team was awarded a single point.

    If a kicking team managed to drop kick or place kick the ball over the crossbar (between the uprights) that team was then awarded three points.

    Football is profoundly tied to rugby; that American football does not use the single is the real failure.

Leave a Reply to Robert Finch Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *