Category: Rules & Regulations

  • Canadian Football’s Quirky Playoffs, Part II: No Dominion Championship in 1885, An All-Star Game Instead

    This is the second in an ongoing series of articles looking back at some of Canadian football’s rather quirky playoff systems used over the years. A previous article examined how tie schedules and challenge cups were used on the road to the first Dominion championship game organized by the Canadian Rugby Football Union in 1884.

    News of the Canadian Rugby Football Union's new Inter-provincial Rugby Match. (Hamilton Spectator)
    News of the Canadian Rugby Football Union’s new Inter-provincial Rugby Match. (Hamilton Spectator)

    It’s now a new year, and Canadian football is still finding its footing so to speak. Good or bad pun? And the CRFU held is second Dominion championship. Sort of. Not really.

    But first, imagine this completely theorical scenario. The Montreal Alouettes and the Saskatchewan Roughriders win the East and West divisions respectively. But instead of the Als and Riders squaring off in the Grey Cup, the culminating game features a team of eastern all-stars playing a team of western all-stars instead. Sound silly? Well, this theorical scenario is how the Canadian football playoffs looked in 1885.

    Like the previous year, the Ontario Rugby Football Union and the Quebec Rugby Football Union both used a tie schedule format. To recap, a tie in this context is simply a pairing of teams. Rather than a balanced schedule with standings, teams were paired up and competed in a knock-out style tournament. The Kingston Daily News featured the tie schedule for the ORFU. Have a look to see how the system worked:

    1885 ORFU Tie Schedule in the Kingston Daily News
    1885 ORFU Tie Schedule in the Kingston Daily News

    In 1885, the ORFU had two separate divisions, one for college teams and one for the city clubs. The winner of each division met for the Ontario Challenge Cup. In Quebec, there were only four teams – Montreal, Britannia, McGill, and Lennoxville – that competed for the Quebec Challenge Cup.

    On January 30, 1885, the CRFU voted to hold an Inter-Provincial Rugby Match comprising players from Ontario and Quebec, selected by their respective unions. This new annual all-star game wasn’t actually intended to replace the Dominion championship, though. But fate had other ideas for 1885.

    Ontario players selected for the 1885 Inter-provincial Rugby Match, Ottawa defeated London in the ORFU city division. (Hamilton Spectator)
    Ontario players selected for the 1885 Inter-provincial Rugby Match, Ottawa defeated London in the ORFU city division. (Hamilton Spectator)

    On October 25th, Ottawa dominated London 38-0 in Toronto to win the Ontario city division. On October 31st, Ottawa College defeated the University of Toronto by a score of 19-2 to win the college division. A week later Ottawa College defeated Ottawa City 21-0 in an all-Ottawa affair to win the Ontario Challenge Cup.

    Ottawa College defeats University of Toronto to win the ORFU college division in 1885. 
(Montreal Gazette)
    Ottawa College defeats University of Toronto to win the ORFU college division in 1885.
    (Montreal Gazette)

    Meanwhile in Quebec, Montreal was once again that province’s dominant team. In a match to decide the winner of the Quebec Challenge Cup on October 10th, Montreal defeated rival Britannia by “two goals and several minor points to one touch.” (Montreal Gazette, 10 October 1885)

    Montreal vs. Britannia in the Quebec Challenge Cup in 1885 (Montreal Gazette)
    Montreal vs. Britannia in the Quebec Challenge Cup in 1885 (Montreal Gazette)

    So, the stage was set for Ottawa College to travel to Montreal to play the Quebec champion in what would be the second Dominion championship. Except, it didn’t happen. In 1885, Montreal was engulfed in a smallpox epidemic. Public health concerns prompted a reluctant Ottawa College to forgo the trip to Montreal. Instead, suggestions were made for Montreal to travel to Ottawa and play the championship there.

    Letter from "Sport" accusing the Montreal Football Club of "funking.
    Letter from “Sport” accusing the Montreal Football Club of “funking.

    There was a rather testy exchange in the Montreal Gazette between a writer from Ottawa named “Sport” and Mr. R. Stirling, the secretary of the Montreal Football Club. “Sport” accused Montreal of “funking.” That’s old British slang for backing out because of fear. Stirling refuted the accusation and explained that logistics and costs simply made the proposal impractical. So that was the end of that. There was no Dominion championship game played in 1885.

    Response to "Sport" from Mr. R. Stirling of the Montreal Football Club.
    Response to “Sport” from Mr. R. Stirling of the Montreal Football Club.

    Instead, we were left with the first Inter-Provincial Rugby Match as being the pinnacle of the 1885 football season in Canada. Played on November 12th, which was Thanksgiving Day, in Toronto the Quebec all-stars scored 3 points over their Ontario counterparts. Because the rules of the day stated that a majority of 4 points were needed for a victory, the game was declared a draw.

    Quebec players selected for the 1885 Inter-provincial Rugby Match. (Montreal Gazette)
    Quebec players selected for the 1885 Inter-provincial Rugby Match. (Montreal Gazette)

    Check out the Montreal Gazette’s great summary of this game, as well as other games (including a soccer game) played on Thanksgiving Day in 1885.

    Coverage of the 1885 Interprovincial Rugby Match plus other football games in Montreal Gazette.
    Coverage of the 1885 Interprovincial Rugby Match plus other football games in Montreal Gazette.

    So, in short…no Dominion championship. An all-star game ending in a draw instead. And some good old mudslinging in the press. That was the Canadian football playoff picture in 1885.


    Sources:
    Canadian Football History Key Historical Milestones and Dates -1861-1889 by Robert Sproule
    Hamilton Spectator, 31 January 1885
    Hamilton Spectator, 26 October 1885
    Kingston Daily News, 13 June 1885
    Montreal Gazette, 12 October 1885
    Montreal Gazette, 3 November 1885
    Montreal Gazette, 4 November 1885
    Montreal Gazette, 14 November 1885
    Montreal Gazette, 16 November 1885
    Montreal Gazette, 18 November 1885

    Fediverse Reactions
  • CFL preseason: There must be a better way, for fans’ sake (1985)

    The 2026 CFL preseason is underway with a full slate of games this weekend. I’m always happy to have football back – even if the games don’t really matter much to us fans. It’s safe to say that the coaches and players themselves get way more out of these matchups than we do.

    Today, CFL teams play two preseason games each – one home and one away. However, teams used to play four preseason games. A four-game exhibition season can make for some long meaningless football from a fan’s perspective.

    Here’s a Canadian Press article by Grant Kerr from 1985 bemoaning the lengthy preseason that saw fans pay regular-season prices to watch rather unexciting football often played by rookies and backups. There’s talk of an 18-game regular season and dropping the preseason games to two (which would be adopted the following year) and even giving a team a point in the regular season standings for a preseason win. An interesting idea that obviously didn’t gain any traction.


    Sources:
    The Regina Leader-Post, 25 June 1985

    Fediverse Reactions
  • Canadian Football’s Quirky Playoffs, Part I: Tie Schedules and Challenge Cups in 1884

    With the recent announcement that the CFL is changing its playoff format in 2027, I thought it would be an interesting learning experience to revisit some of the old playoff systems used in Canadian football, starting in 1884.

    When the Canadian Rugby Football Union was relaunched in 1884, one of its mandates was to establish a national championship between the Ontario Rugby Football Union and the Quebec Rugby Football Union. Both the ORFU and QRFU held their own competitions using what was called the Tie Schedule. In this context, a tie refers to a match pairing between two teams and not a draw. Basically, Team A played Team B and the winner played Team C. The winner of that game played Team D and so forth until only one team remained undefeated. It was more or less a knock-out style tournament as opposed to a balanced round-robin schedule like the regular season we are accustomed to today.

    In Quebec, the Montreal Football Club and the Britannia Football Club met on October 11th with Montreal securing a 14-2 victory. On the same day, McGill defeated Bishop’s by a score of 50-0. The following week, the two victors met with Montreal coming out on top 21-0 to win the QRFU. Montreal had defeated Britannia, McGill, as well as the Kingston Cadets.

    Article about the Montreal-Britannia game. (Montreal Gazette, 3 November 1884)

    Quebec also used the Challenge System where a team could “challenge” the champion, If the challengers won, they became the champions; if the champions won, they remained champions. On November 1st, Britannia challenged Montreal for the Quebec Union’s Challenge Cup. Montreal scored a rouge, the only point scored in the entire game. According to a report in the Montreal Gazette, the game was declared a draw. Montreal retained their title and was declared the Quebec champion. Apparently, this game was played using the old English Rugby rules. I presume this is the reason the game was officially a draw as only goals and tries were counted in English Rugby rules. Why this particular game was played using old English Rugby rules instead of the emerging Canadian-style game is rather odd. The article in the Gazette alludes to the game being rather boring.

    A summary of the 1884 Ontario Rugby Football Union playoffs. (Toronto Mail, 4 November 1884)

    In Ontario, fourteen teams were eligible to compete in the playoffs for the Ontario Cup. Five of these teams chose not to play. The remaining nine – Toronto, University of Toronto, Hamilton, London, Peterboro, Strathroy, Queen’s University, Royal Military College, and Ottawa – were paired up in a knock-out style tournament lasting four rounds…well, almost four rounds. In the final game for the Ontario Cup, Toronto was supposed to host Ottawa. But Ottawa forfeited the game, leaving Toronto as the Ontario champions.

    Ottawa forfeits the Ontario Challenge Cup. (Montreal Star, 3 November 1884)

    So, that’s how the two provincial champions were crowned in 1884. Montreal was declared the Quebec champion after a draw against Britannia in a game that was played using different rules. Toronto was the declared the Ontario champion after Ottawa didn’t show up. A bit anti-climatic, eh?

    Preview of the CRFU Dominion Championship between Toronto and Montreal. (Toronto Mail, 6 November 1884)

    Nevertheless, the scene was set for the first-ever Rugby Football Championship of the Dominion. Held at the University of Toronto on November 6th, the Montreal Football Club handily defeated the Toronto Football Club by a score of 30-0 in front of 1500 fans. Montreal scored two goals, three tries, and two rouges.

    Summary of the Montreal victory over Toronto in the first Dominion championship. (Montreal Gazette, 7 November 1884)

    Despite the informalities and quirks associated with the season schedules used at the time, the domination of the Montreal Football Club arguably proved that they were strongest team in Canada and worthy of being called Dominion champions.

    Something else stood out to me when researching the 1884 season. There were several more exhibition games played after the Dominion championship in Toronto. For instance, after losing the championship game Toronto travelled to Montreal to play the Britannias. Imagine the losing team of the Grey Cup playing a meaningless road game the following week? Ah, such are the peculiarities of good old Canadian football.


    Special thanks to Robert Sproule who shared with me some of his research on early Canadian football during this period. It helped shed some light on on the tie schedule format and general structure of the leagues.


    Sources:
    Canadian Football Timeline (Canadian Football Research Society)
    Important Dates in Canadian Football by Bob Sproule, Coffin Corner, 1991
    Montreal Gazette, 3 November 1884
    Montreal Gazette, 7 November 1884
    Montreal Star, 3 November 1884
    Toronto Mail, 4 November 1884
    Toronto Mail, 6 November 1884

    Fediverse Reactions
  • 100 Yard Fields in Early Canadian Football

    When CFL Commissioner Stewart Johnston announced sweeping rule changes to the Canadian game last month, one modification that probably alarmed traditionalists the most was the change to the size of the CFL football field. In 2027, the field will shrink from 110 yards in length to 100 yards between the goal lines.

    I can certainly sympathize with the “Save the 55” crowd. After all, we humans tend not to like change. Especially when it comes to changing something we cherish. But upon further review, it appears that 100-yard football fields are not new to Canadian football.

    In fact, early Canadian football was played on 100 yard long fields. In 1880, the very first rule in the new Canadian Rugby Football Union rule book stated that “The Grounds shall be, as near as possible, 100 yards long by 50 yards broad.” Of course, it’s important to remember that the game around this time was more like rugby football than the gridiron game we are accustomed to today. But still, that’s a small field.

    100 yard long fields continued to be the norm for several years. While the 1884 CRFU Laws of the Game stated that the field of play should not exceed 110 yards in length, in 1885, the CRFU clarified that the field should be 100 yards long by 65 yards wide.
    It appears the 110 yard by 65 yard standard was finally widely adopted by the 1890s. That is the size of the field mentioned in the rules when the new Canadian Rugby Union was formed in 1891.

    So, what’s the point of this discussion? Well, nothing really except to reiterate that Canadian football is not static. The rules and regulations of the game have been evolving since the beginning. And in the case of the 100 yard long field coming in 2027, it can be equally argued that rather than moving the CFL closer to the American game, we are instead taking Canadian football back to its early years.


    Sources:
    Rules of the Rugby Union Game of Football adopted by the Canadian Rugby Football Union, 14 September 1880
    Canadian Rugby Football Union Constitution and Laws of the Game, 1 July 1884
    The Montreal Star, 14 November 1885

  • CFL Goes With Shorter End Zones

    The Johnston Rules are coming to Canadian football. Proponents argue they will open up the Canadian game and lead to more exciting touchdowns. Opponents grumble they represent creeping Americanization of our unique brand of football. Others shrug their shoulders and wonder what all the fuss is about. Wherever you land on this spectrum one thing is clear: CFL Commissioner Stewart Johnston has introduced sweeping changes to Canadian football.

    Now, there are plenty of places online to discuss (or vent about) these changes. But here at Canadian Football History, we focus on the past. One of the changes featured in the Johnston Rules is the shrinking of the field length and end zones. So, I thought it would be timely to revisit the last time the CFL modified its field dimensions.

    Once upon a time, the regulation Canadian football field was 110 yards long between the goal lines with two 25 yard end zones. If you watch older CFL games you will realize just how massive the end zones were. The extra deep end zones gave quarterbacks some good real estate to pass for touchdowns.

    CFL rule changes in 1986
    CFL rule changes, including shortening the end zones from 25 to 20 yards, in 1986. (Regina Leader-Post)

    Then in 1983, Vancouver opened BC Place Stadium, the first domed stadium in Canada. The 60,000-seat stadium was a state-of-the-art facility that rivalled Montreal’s Olympic Stadium in terms of capacity and amenities. The trouble was that a full-length Canadian football field wouldn’t fit in the new stadium. So, the BC Lions played on a field that had only 20 yard end zones.

    Other CFL stadiums couldn’t quite fit the full 25 yard end zones, either. So, they would clip the corners of the end zone and make do the best they could. Finally in 1986, the Canadian Football League officially adopted 20 yard end zones as the new standard.


    The CFL’s long end zones posed a problem during the league’s brief foray into the United States. Most American football stadiums could not accommodate the longer Canadian field, particularly the 20 yard end zones. So, we ended up with a mishmash of end zones in the CFL’s U.S.-based stadiums. Without question the worst set up was in Memphis where the end zones were only seven yards in length near the sidelines; at most they were less than 15 yards deep in the centre.


    Whenever a sports league makes a rule change – especially if it’s a significant one – there will no doubt ensue a passionate debate amongst the fanbase. That’s probably healthy in the grand scheme of things; after all, apathy is a very difficult thing to overcome. So, if people are talking and you are in the conversation, that means people care. This week was certainly no different. CFL fans have proven they are some of the most passionate sports fans around. I thought I’d end with a selection of fan suggestions for the CFL published in the Toronto Star in 1986.

    CFL fan suggestions in the Toronto Star
    CFL fan suggestions in the Toronto Star
    Rule changes suggested by CFL fans published in the Toronto Star.

    Sources:
    The Toronto Star (13 February 1986)
    The Regina Leader Post (24 June 1986)

    Fediverse Reactions